<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performancing for Firefox- review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/</link>
	<description>Design, Marketing, Blogging, Branding and all things Creative</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: firefox homepage</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>firefox homepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>char, i also do the same with wordpress. its easier that way, i save it then i go back to it when i feel like writting again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>char, i also do the same with wordpress. its easier that way, i save it then i go back to it when i feel like writting again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Erfurt</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-4333</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Erfurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-4333</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the review - using a blog editor is something that I have not had an occasion to try out yet, but it might be a convenient feature if I ever wind up having to juggle multiple blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the review - using a blog editor is something that I have not had an occasion to try out yet, but it might be a convenient feature if I ever wind up having to juggle multiple blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get paid for posting at Performancing at Randa Clay Design</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Get paid for posting at Performancing at Randa Clay Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-285</guid>
		<description>[...] have posted in the past about how much I use the Performancing (now called ScribeFire) blogging extension for Firefox. The Performancing site has undergone some changes lately and one of the more exciting ones is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have posted in the past about how much I use the Performancing (now called ScribeFire) blogging extension for Firefox. The Performancing site has undergone some changes lately and one of the more exciting ones is the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-21</guid>
		<description>heya... you can choose not to have that silly tag "Powered by Performancing" by going to settings/publishing features and unchecking the right box.

Try it, that's what I did.

Tom, thanks for the two programs... I'm off to try both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heya&#8230; you can choose not to have that silly tag &#8220;Powered by Performancing&#8221; by going to settings/publishing features and unchecking the right box.</p>
<p>Try it, that&#8217;s what I did.</p>
<p>Tom, thanks for the two programs&#8230; I&#8217;m off to try both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 04:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Randa; I write three blogs and contribute to a couple others, and find that a blog editor is a huge timesaver compared to dealing with the editors in blog software.

Some love Performancing, but I just couldn't fall in love (I tried). 

BlogDesk is an excellent editor that I'd be using now if it didn't have a few problems with my system. Try it (it's free), and tell me it doesn't save you an hour a week, minimum.

I've settled on Windows LiveWriter (despite the typically Microsoft clumsiness) and think it's similar to BlogDesk. 

If you're writing several blogs, give the above two editors a try. Both are free, both setup in seconds, and both are huge time savers. 

Good luck!
Tom Chandler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randa; I write three blogs and contribute to a couple others, and find that a blog editor is a huge timesaver compared to dealing with the editors in blog software.</p>
<p>Some love Performancing, but I just couldn&#8217;t fall in love (I tried). </p>
<p>BlogDesk is an excellent editor that I&#8217;d be using now if it didn&#8217;t have a few problems with my system. Try it (it&#8217;s free), and tell me it doesn&#8217;t save you an hour a week, minimum.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve settled on Windows LiveWriter (despite the typically Microsoft clumsiness) and think it&#8217;s similar to BlogDesk. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re writing several blogs, give the above two editors a try. Both are free, both setup in seconds, and both are huge time savers. </p>
<p>Good luck!<br />
Tom Chandler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randa</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Randa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I frequently save things as drafts while logged into my blogs, so I was glad Performancing had that feature.  It's the only reason I keep using it really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequently save things as drafts while logged into my blogs, so I was glad Performancing had that feature.  It&#8217;s the only reason I keep using it really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Char</title>
		<link>http://randaclay.com/blogging/performancing-for-firefox-review/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Char</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randaclay.com/archives/performancing-for-firefox-review#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I tried Qumana and Performancing. They both have nice features, but in the end I decided that it was just as easy and time effective to log in and out of each of my blogs, write the post and go.

You can save drafts in WordPress. Just choose Save instead of Publish. Then when you come back click on the title of the post you want to continue. I do this all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Qumana and Performancing. They both have nice features, but in the end I decided that it was just as easy and time effective to log in and out of each of my blogs, write the post and go.</p>
<p>You can save drafts in WordPress. Just choose Save instead of Publish. Then when you come back click on the title of the post you want to continue. I do this all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
